Why candidates hate fundraising

Why candidates hate fundraising
And why it's the consultant's job to make them love it

I hate calling people to ask for money. I hate begging. I hate fundraising! It usually takes less than a full day dialing for dollars before the fundraising-induced rage starts to build for your candidate.

As a professional fundraiser, I see the financial aspect of campaigning unfairly targeted time and time again by candidates. They hate it. I get that. The animosity candidates have toward fundraising isn’t just a problem for them. It’s a major problem for the political professionals, too. For the candidate, It’s hard to even approach competitiveness in an election when you’re near penniless or underfunded. For the consultants and vendors, and I’m not questioning your charitable altruistic hearts here, but I doubt most firms take a candidate’s undying adoration as a form of payment.

This is why it’s the consultant’s job to make candidates embrace the ask. To get there, you have to first put aside your frustration with a candidate who simply doesn’t want to pick up the phone. It starts with understanding why it’s a process they hate. From my experience, there are three major reasons.

It’s Demeaning and Unfulfilling

Did little Johnny Candidate ever say, “I’d like to be a telemarketer or a panhandler when I grow up?” Of course not. However, that is largely what a candidate is vocationally reduced to for months on end despite having developed marketable, specialized skills in his or her career. Fundraising can be tedious, boring and repetitious. It’s a creative, right-brainer’s nightmare.

It’s Too Truthful

When your candidate knocks on doors, speaks to civic groups and attends political events, lots of people call themselves supporters. We all know, however, a substantial percentage of these people are proven to be dirty, rotten liars every election cycle. Still, your candidate loves hearing it. Asking someone to donate is like administering a great elixir of truth regarding their support and often candidates want to live in the land of make believe to postpone the pain of reality. Fundraising is the one area of campaigning that consistently and continually offers a steady stream of rejection, refusal and dismissal from friends, associates and total strangers.

It’s Emotionally Distressing for Lazy People

A generation or so ago, our grandparents commonly recognized a condition that caused particular individuals to be incapable of completing routine tasks that required significant effort applied in a consistent fashion. It was called laziness. Pronounced: la’-zi-ness (likely of Low German origin). Today, using this term to describe apparently stricken individuals is considered coarse.

If you feel your candidate may be suffering from this condition, there is a sure test. Administer a list of fundraising calls to the patient and come back in an hour or so. Repeat this process for several days. If the candidate becomes delusional, fabricating stories about imaginary calls and curling up in the fetal position when fundraising is mentioned, you may have a bad case on your hands.

A point in clarification: The above are reasons your candidate will not physically execute the tasks required for fundraising with the appropriate regularity or in the necessary volume to reach your fundraising goals. There are other elements that weigh in heavily regarding a candidate’s fundraising capacity which include their personal sphere of financial influence, amassed personal wealth, and favor curried with major individual and organizational contributors. We do not address these here, but rather are instead interested in the amount of fight in the dog, not the circumstances of the dog in the fight, lest readers feel compelled to make excuses for their underdog. So here are a few ideas to give your pup some pep:

Forget Results, Measure Actions

When you say, “We need to raise $1,000,000 this quarter,” what you really are stating is a desired result. Unless your candidate is a practiced alchemist, he can’t actually accomplish that feat in one fell swoop. All the candidate can tangibly and measurably do in most cases is to communicate with prospective donors in some fashion.

Break your quarterly goals into bite-sized pieces and assign the appropriate amount of candidate communication to reach the goal based on likely statistical outcomes. At some juncture in a campaign, you get a good idea of what percentages of people are reached per call, what percentage contributes and what an average gift equals.

Share this article


Submit a comment

Required field are marked with “*”.